Posted by: Bagewafa | دسمبر 21, 2011

Rogue Nation—Charley Reese

Rogue Nation

by Charley Reese

One gets the impression that there are some people inWashingtonwho believe thatIsraelor theU.S.can bombIran’s nuclear reactors, fly home, and it will be mission complete.

It makes you wonder if perhaps there is a virus going around that is gradually making people stupid. If we orIsraelattackIran, we will have a new war on our hands. The Iranians are not going to shrug off an attack and say, "You naughty boys, you.”

Consider how much troubleIraqhas given us. Some 4,000 dead and 29,000 wounded, a half a trillion dollars in cost and still climbing, and five years later, we cannot say that the country is pacified.

Iraqis a small country compared withIran.Iranhas about 70 million people. Its western mountains border thePersian Gulf. In other words, its missiles and guns look down on theU.S.ships below it. And it has lots of missiles, from short-range to intermediate-range (around 2,200 kilometers).

More to the point, it has been equipped byRussiawith the fastest anti-ship missile on the planet. The SS-N-22 Sunburn can travel at Mach 3 at high altitude and at Mach 2.2 at low altitude. That is faster than anything in our arsenal.

Iran’s conventional forces include an army of 540,000 men and 300,000 reserves, including 120,000 Iranian Guards especially trained in unconventional warfare. It has more than 1,600 main battle tanks and 21,000 other armored combat vehicles. It has 3,200 artillery pieces, three submarines, 59 surface warships and 10 amphibious ships.

It’s been receiving help in arming itself fromChina,North KoreaandRussia. UnlikeIraq,Iran’s forces have not been worn down with bombing, wars and sanctions. It also has a new anti-aircraft defense system fromRussiathat I’ve heard is pretty snazzy.

So, if you think we orIsraelcan attackIranand not expect retaliation, I’d have to say with regret that you are a moron. If you think we could easily handleIranin an all-out war, I’d have to promote you to idiot.

AttackingIranwould be folly, but we seem to be living in the Age of Folly. Morons and idiots took us into an unjustified war againstIraqbefore we had finished the job inAfghanistan. Now we have troops tied down in both countries.

Chinahas a tremendous investment and interest inIranand would likely see an attack as a threat to its national interests.Chinacould strike a large blow against theU.S.just by dumping the financial paper we have foolishly allowed the Chinese to pile up, thanks to the trade deficit.

For some years now, I’ve worried that we seem to be more and more like Colonial England — arrogant, racist, overestimating our own capacity and underestimating that of our enemies. As the fate of theBritish Empiredemonstrates, that is a fatal flaw.

The British never dreamed that the "little yellow people” could come ashore by land and takeSingaporefrom the rear or that they would sink the pride of the British fleet, but they did both.

I suppose no one inWashingtoncan imagine the Iranians sinking one of our carriers in thePersian Gulf. How’d you like to be the president who has to tell the American people that we’ve lost a carrier for the first time since World War II?

Exactly how the Iranians will respond to an attack, I don’t know, but they will respond. In keeping with our present policy, our attack onIranwould be illegal, since under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,Iranhas the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

Who would have thought that we would become the rogue nation committing acts of aggression around the globe?

June 30, 2008

Charley Reese [send him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.

Charley Reese Archives



%d bloggers like this: